✨ LEGAL LEARNING | SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE MADE SIMPLE ✨
By Shri Ganpati Jurists ⚖️
Raghbir Singh v. Smt. Paramjit Kaur, (Punjab And Haryana)
📌 Big takeaway for property & contract law enthusiasts:
An agreement to sell signed only by the vendor can still be a valid and enforceable contract.
🔹 No purchaser’s signature? Not a deal-breaker.
If the vendor signs the agreement and delivers it to the purchaser, and both sides show mutual consent and intention to perform, the law recognizes it as binding.
🔹 What really matters? Intention + conduct.
Courts look beyond technicalities. Mutual assent and readiness to perform carry more weight than missing signatures.
🔹 Fraud is not assumed. It must be proved.
Just because stamp paper was originally purchased for another purpose doesn’t mean fraud.
👉 Fraud must be clearly pleaded and strictly proved with solid evidence.
🔹 Injunctions bind only those named.
A person not restrained by a court order cannot be punished for contempt. Injunctions are not universal—they are specific.
⚖️ Why this matters:
This ruling strengthens genuine transactions and discourages frivolous defences based on hyper-technical objections.
📚 Law is not just about signatures.
It’s about intention, fairness, and justice.
Follow Shri Ganpati Jurists for crisp, practical, and courtroom-ready legal insights. 🚩
PunjabLaw #ChandigarhLawyers #ChandigarhAdvocates #ChandigarhLegal #BathindaLawyers #BathindaAdvocates
SpecificPerformance# AgreementToSell
#ContractLaw #PropertyLaw #CivilLaw