Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates

📱 Can the Government Temporarily Block an Entire Social Media Platform? (Telegram Case) The Delhi High Court in Telegram FZ LLC v. Union of India upheld the temporary blocking of Telegram during the NEET UG, 2026 examination fraud controversy. 🔹 Key Takeaways: ✅ Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 empowers the Government to block not only specific content but, in appropriate circumstances, access to an intermediary platform itself. ✅ Any blocking order must satisfy the doctrine of proportionality: • Legitimate objective • Rational connection with the objective • Necessity • Least restrictive measure available ✅ The Court held that Telegram had become a significant channel for dissemination of leaked examination material, and narrower alternatives were found ineffective. ✅ Emergency blocking without a prior hearing was permitted due to urgent public interest concerns, provided a post-decisional hearing is subsequently granted. ✅ The temporary nature of the restriction and the disabling of specific features were considered proportionate and narrowly tailored measures. 📌 Legal Principle: Where a digital platform is being systematically misused in a manner that threatens public order or the integrity of a national examination, temporary restrictions may be justified if they satisfy constitutional standards of proportionality. ⚖️ Technology rights are important. ⚖️ Public interest is important. ⚖️ The law seeks to balance both. #LegalLearning #InformationTechnologyAct #Section69A #CyberLaw #DigitalRights #DelhiHighCourt #Telegram #NEET2026 #ConstitutionalLaw #LawUpdate #ShriGanpatiJurists

📱 Can the Government Temporarily Block an Entire Social Media Platform? (Telegram Case) The D…

🌍 Your Property in India May Be at Risk Even If You Live Abroad. Many NRIs and foreign nationals believe that because they legally own property in India, their rights are automatically protected. Unfortunately, reality can be very different. Over the years, property owners living overseas have faced issues such as: ▪ Unauthorized occupation of property ▪ Illegal sale attempts using forged documents ▪ Family disputes over inherited assets ▪ Misuse of powers of attorney ▪ Delayed discovery of encroachments and title issues The biggest challenge is often not the dispute itself, but discovering it too late. Distance should never become a disadvantage when it comes to protecting your legal rights. Understanding your legal position today can prevent years of disputes tomorrow. ⚖️ Legal Awareness Series by Shri Ganpati Jurists #NRIProperty #PropertyLaw #IndiaProperty #LegalAwareness #NRILawyer #PropertyDisputes #LegalRights #ForeignInvestors #IndianLaw #ShriGanpatiJurists

🌍 Your Property in India May Be at Risk Even If You Live Abroad. Many NRIs and foreign nation…

🔒 Is Your Source Code Really Protected When You Hire Remote Developers? Many international startups outsource software development to remote teams across borders. While this reduces costs, it also creates a legal risk that founders often overlook—Intellectual Property Ownership. 📌 Consider this scenario: A foreign SaaS company hires a remote developer to build its core platform. The developer receives access to the entire codebase. Months later, a dispute arises over payments. The developer claims ownership over modifications made to the software and restricts access to critical project assets. The company’s contract contains confidentiality provisions, but lacks clear clauses on: ✔ Intellectual Property Assignment ✔ Governing Law and Jurisdiction ✔ Cross-Border Dispute Resolution As a result, enforcing rights becomes significantly more complex and expensive. Before engaging remote developers or outsourced teams, businesses should ensure that their agreements clearly address: • Ownership of all code, designs and work product • Confidentiality and data protection obligations • Jurisdiction and dispute resolution mechanisms • Remedies in case of unauthorized use or disclosure A well-drafted agreement can prevent costly disputes before they arise. 💡 Legal protection should grow at the same pace as your business. #StartupLaw #IntellectualProperty #ContractLaw #RemoteWork #SaaS #LegalCompliance #TechnologyLaw #ShriGanpatiJurists

🏠 Is Your Tenant Refusing to Vacate After Expiry of the Lease? ❓ The lease period has ended. ❓ The tenant continues to occupy the property. ❓ No fresh lease agreement has been executed. ❓ You have accepted rent after expiry of the lease. Does that mean you have automatically agreed to continue the tenancy? ⚖️ Not necessarily. The Calcutta High Court in Sri Bimal Kumar Ghosh v. Indian Overseas Bank held that mere acceptance of rent after expiry of a lease does not by itself create a tenancy by holding over under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. For a tenancy by holding over to arise, there must be assent of the landlord to the continued occupation. A tenant who remains in possession after expiry of the lease without such assent may merely be a tenant at sufferance and can be liable for eviction and mesne profits. 📌 Acceptance of rent alone is not enough. The landlord’s intention and consent are crucial. #PropertyLaw #LeaseAgreement #LandlordRights #TenantDisputes #TransferOfPropertyAct #MesneProfits #LegalUpdate #Advocate

🏠  Is Your Tenant Refusing to Vacate After Expiry of the Lease? ❓ The lease period has ended.…

🚨 Unauthorized Bank Transaction? RBI Rules Protect You — But Only If You Act Fast! 🚨 As per the RBI Circular dated 06.07.2017 on “Limiting Liability of Customers in Unauthorised Electronic Banking Transactions”: ✅ ZERO LIABILITY OF CUSTOMER You will not bear any loss if: • The fraud occurred due to negligence, deficiency, or security failure on the part of the bank; or • The fraud was caused by a third-party breach and you inform the bank within 3 working days of receiving the transaction alert. ⚠️ CUSTOMER MAY BE LIABLE If the fraud occurred because of your negligence, such as: • Sharing OTP, PIN, password, CVV, or banking credentials; • Clicking suspicious links; • Installing unknown applications; • Allowing fraudsters access to your device or banking information. In such cases, you may bear the loss until the fraud is reported to the bank. 📌 Important Takeaway The RBI policy protects vigilant customers, not careless conduct. Report suspicious transactions immediately. 📞 If you notice an unauthorized transaction: 1️⃣ Inform your bank immediately. 2️⃣ Call Cyber Helpline 1930. 3️⃣ File a complaint at cybercrime.gov.in. 4️⃣ Preserve all screenshots and records. ⏰ Delay in reporting can reduce your protection under RBI guidelines. Stay Alert. Stay Secure. Know Your Rights. #RBI #BankingLaw #CyberFraud #ConsumerProtection #DigitalBanking #FinancialAwareness

🚨  Unauthorized Bank Transaction? RBI Rules Protect You — But Only If You Act Fast!  🚨 As pe…

🧒🏽⚖️ Minor’s Property Cannot Be Dealt With Freely by a Guardian The Supreme Court has once again reinforced an important principle under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956: 👉 A natural guardian holds a minor’s property in a fiduciary capacity, not as an absolute owner. Key Takeaways: ✅ Prior court permission is mandatory before selling or transferring a minor’s immovable property. ✅ A transaction made without such permission is not void, but voidable at the instance of the minor after attaining majority. ✅ The minor must challenge the transaction within the prescribed limitation period. ✅ Avoidance of the transaction need not always be through a formal suit; clear and unequivocal conduct may suffice. ✅ Until avoided, the transaction continues to bind the minor’s interest. ✅ Section 8 applies to a minor’s separate property, not ordinarily to undivided joint family property. ✅ The guiding consideration is always the welfare and benefit of the minor. ⚖️ The law strikes a careful balance between practical management of a minor’s estate and protection against irreversible decisions that may prejudice the minor’s future rights. Principle: Unauthorized alienations are made voidable, not void, preserving both the minor’s interests and certainty in property transactions. #SupremeCourt #MinorRights #PropertyLaw #Guardianship #Section8HMGA #HinduLaw #LegalUpdate #IndianLaw #Advocate

🧒🏽⚖️  Minor’s Property Cannot Be Dealt With Freely by a Guardian The Supreme Court has once …

“Can a Lok Adalat dissolve your marriage? The Allahabad High Court says NO.” ⚖️ ⚖️ Lok Adalats Cannot Grant Divorce Decrees: Allahabad High Court In Sushma Devi v. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Lucknow & 2 Others, the Allahabad High Court held that a Lok Adalat or DLSA has no adjudicatory jurisdiction to grant a decree of divorce. The Court strongly observed that: ✅ Lok Adalats can facilitate settlements between parties. ❌ Lok Adalats cannot dissolve a marriage. ❌ DLSAs cannot exercise powers vested exclusively in Family Courts. The Court criticized the DLSA for acting beyond its statutory role and emphasized that matrimonial disputes must be decided strictly in accordance with law by courts having competent jurisdiction. 🔑 Key Takeaway Settlement can happen in a Lok Adalat. Divorce cannot. #AllahabadHighCourt #SushmaDeviCase #LokAdalat #FamilyCourt #DivorceLaw #MatrimonialLaw #LegalUpdate #IndianLaw #LegalAwareness

“Can a Lok Adalat dissolve your marriage? The Allahabad High Court says NO.”  ⚖️ ⚖️  Lok Adala…