Can Interim Maintenance Be Refused Before the Final Decision? Let’s understand with a simple example. A and B are husband and wife. Due to matrimonial disputes, B starts living separately and files an application seeking interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. In response, A files an application under Section 125(4) CrPC, alleging that B is living in adultery, and places photographs, videos, and other electronic evidence before the Court in support of that application. Question: Should the Court postpone deciding A’s application until the final disposal of the maintenance proceedings? The Supreme Court says—not necessarily. If the husband produces clear, cogent, and prima facie evidence establishing a statutory disqualification under Section 125(4) CrPC, the Court can examine that issue at the intermediate stage itself. It is not required to defer the issue in every case until the final adjudication. However, mere allegations are not enough. If the evidence requires detailed examination or its authenticity is disputed, interim maintenance may continue until the Court decides the application under Section 125(4). The judgment also reiterates that: ✔ Electronic evidence must satisfy the legal requirements for admissibility. ✔ Unsupported allegations cannot defeat a maintenance claim. ✔ Courts must balance the social object of maintenance law with the statutory disqualifications provided by Parliament. Key Takeaway: Interim maintenance is intended to prevent destitution, but it is not an absolute right. Where a statutory bar under Section 125(4) CrPC is supported by clear and prima facie evidence, the Court may examine that issue before granting or continuing interim maintenance. Based on the Supreme Court judgment in Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan (2026 INSC 778). #SupremeCourt #MaintenanceLaw #Section125 #FamilyLaw #LegalUpdate #IndianLaw #EvidenceLaw #Litigation #Advocacy #ShriGanpatiJurists

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Best Advocate in Bathinda Best Advocate in Chandigarh Can Interim Maintenance Be Refused Before…

Best Advocate in Bathinda

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Don’t Make This Mistake: An Ex Parte Order Does NOT Mean You Have Automatically Won the Case …

Best Lawyer in Chandigarh

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Can Authorities Evict Shopkeepers Without Rehabilitation? The Chhattisgarh High Court, in Jha…

Best Lawyer in Bathinda

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

⚖️  Supreme Court | M/s Tata Steel Ltd. v. Varsha The Supreme Court reaffirmed the  “Clean Sla…

Best Advocates in Bathinda

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act Applies Only Between Co-Heirs The Supreme Court, in  Ma…

Can You Claim Property Ownership Through GPA & Agreement to Sell? Delhi High Court Says NO Many property disputes arise from documents like GPA, Agreement to Sell, receipts, or affidavits. But can these documents make you the legal owner? The Delhi High Court in Manish Gupta v. Shiv Ratan Gupta has made it clear: 👉 GPA & Agreement to Sell do NOT transfer ownership ✅ Ownership of immovable property can only be transferred through a registered sale deed (as per Section 54, Transfer of Property Act). 👉 Living in a property for years does NOT mean ownership ✅ Long possession alone is not enough ✅ Adverse possession must be open, continuous, exclusive, and hostile 👉 Delay can weaken your claim ✅ Filing a case after many years may lead to dismissal due to limitation Key Takeaway: Always ensure proper legal documentation when dealing with property. Relying on informal documents can lead to serious legal issues. Stay informed. Protect your rights. https://lnkd.in/gdVJAKJK #LegalLearning #PropertyLaw #PropertyDispute #PropertyOwnership #TransferOfPropertyAct #AgreementToSell #GPA #RegisteredSaleDeed #AdversePossession #DelhiHighCourt #CivilLaw #RealEstateLaw #LegalAwareness ShriGanpatiJuristAdvocacy#LawyersOfIndia #PunjabLaw #ChandigarhLawyers #ChandigarhAdvocates #ChandigarhLegal #BathindaLawyers #BathindaAdvocates

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Can You Claim Property Ownership Through GPA & Agreement to Sell? Delhi High Court Says NO…

Bathinda Advocates Lawyers Bathinda

by VINEET MITTAL Shri Ganpati Jurists / Bathinda Lawyers/ Bathinda Advocates -

Legal Learning | Shri Ganpati Jurists Vinesh @ Vinesh Soni v. State of Punjab (Punjab & H…

Load More
That is All