Best Lawyer in Bathinda

⚖️  Supreme Court | M/s Tata Steel Ltd. v. Varsha The Supreme Court reaffirmed the  “Clean Sla…

Best Advocates in Bathinda

Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act Applies Only Between Co-Heirs The Supreme Court, in  Ma…

Can You Claim Property Ownership Through GPA & Agreement to Sell? Delhi High Court Says NO Many property disputes arise from documents like GPA, Agreement to Sell, receipts, or affidavits. But can these documents make you the legal owner? The Delhi High Court in Manish Gupta v. Shiv Ratan Gupta has made it clear: 👉 GPA & Agreement to Sell do NOT transfer ownership ✅ Ownership of immovable property can only be transferred through a registered sale deed (as per Section 54, Transfer of Property Act). 👉 Living in a property for years does NOT mean ownership ✅ Long possession alone is not enough ✅ Adverse possession must be open, continuous, exclusive, and hostile 👉 Delay can weaken your claim ✅ Filing a case after many years may lead to dismissal due to limitation Key Takeaway: Always ensure proper legal documentation when dealing with property. Relying on informal documents can lead to serious legal issues. Stay informed. Protect your rights. https://lnkd.in/gdVJAKJK #LegalLearning #PropertyLaw #PropertyDispute #PropertyOwnership #TransferOfPropertyAct #AgreementToSell #GPA #RegisteredSaleDeed #AdversePossession #DelhiHighCourt #CivilLaw #RealEstateLaw #LegalAwareness ShriGanpatiJuristAdvocacy#LawyersOfIndia #PunjabLaw #ChandigarhLawyers #ChandigarhAdvocates #ChandigarhLegal #BathindaLawyers #BathindaAdvocates

Can You Claim Property Ownership Through GPA & Agreement to Sell? Delhi High Court Says NO…

Bathinda Advocates Lawyers Bathinda

Legal Learning | Shri Ganpati Jurists Vinesh @ Vinesh Soni v. State of Punjab (Punjab & H…

Bathinda Advocates Lawyers Bathinda

Legal Learning | Shri Ganpati Jurists Amendment of Pleadings to Correct Property Description i…

Lawyers Bathinda Property Advocates Bathinda

⚖️  Bombay High Court | Legal Learning 🏛️  Ibrahim Babubhai Chokiya v. M/s. Westinrely Develo…

📚 Legal Learning | Shri Ganpati Jurists Can a Lawyer Settle Your Case Without Your Consent? The Supreme Court in Krishna Kumar Ojha v. Jitendra Chaudhary clarified an important legal principle: ✅ A compromise decree is valid only if: * It is in writing. * It is signed by the parties. * It is voluntarily accepted by them. ⚖️ A lawyer cannot enter into a compromise affecting a client’s substantial legal rights without the client’s express authority. Mere implied authority is not enough. Another Important Observation The Supreme Court also observed that: * Limitation law applies to the acts of parties, not to the actions of the Court. * Where fraud is alleged, the Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 151 CPC to secure the ends of justice, even if procedural irregularities exist. Key Takeaway: Your legal rights cannot be compromised without your informed consent. Courts have the power to prevent injustice, particularly where fraud is involved. Legal Learning by Shri Ganpati Jurists #LegalLearning #SupremeCourt #CivilProcedureCode #CPC #Order23Rule3 #Section151CPC #CompromiseDecree #Fraud #Justice #IndianLaw #Litigation #Advocate #LawStudents #LegalAwareness #ShriGanpatiJurists

Bathinda Advocates Lawyers Advocates  📚  Legal Learning | Shri Ganpati Jurists Can a Lawyer Se…

Load More
That is All