Bathinda Advocates Bathinda Lawyers Shri Ganpati Jurists shri ganpati jurists (advocate vineet mittal) / best advocate / lawyer in bathinda/ top law firm

⚖️ LEGAL LEARNING

Shri Ganpati Jurists

Ankit Saha v. State of U.P.
Allahabad High Court

Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

A woman who is educated, professionally qualified, and earning sufficient income for her own maintenance is not entitled to claim maintenance from her husband.

✦ Key Judicial Insights ✦

• Financial Independence is Decisive
Section 125 Cr.P.C. is meant to prevent destitution — not to create entitlement where the wife is self-sufficient.

• Substantial Income Bars Maintenance
A gainfully employed wife with adequate monthly earnings and no proven liabilities cannot seek maintenance.

• Clean Hands Doctrine
Litigants must approach the Court with honesty, transparency, and complete disclosure.

• Suppression of Material Facts
Concealing employment or income amounts to abuse of process and disentitles relief.

⚖️ Legal Principle

Law assists the vigilant, not those who conceal facts.

Maintenance law is a shield against hardship — not a weapon for unjust enrichment.

#LawyersInBathinda #AdvocatesInBathinda #LawyersBathinda #AdvocateBathinda #LegalHelpBathinda #BathindaAdvocates #BathindaLawyers #LegalServicesBathinda #LawyersPunjab #AdvocatesPunjab #LegalHelpPunjab #PunjabLegalExperts #LegalAdviceIndia #IndianLawFirm #LegalAwareness #KnowYourRights #LegalSupport#Section125CrPC #MaintenanceLaw #FamilyLawIndia #CrPCLaw #IndianJudiciary #AllahabadHighCourt #MaintenanceCase #WomensMaintenance #EarningWife #SelfSufficientWife #CleanHandsDoctrine #SuppressionOfFacts #JudicialDiscipline #LegalAwareness #CaseLawUpdate #LawProfessionals 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post